Pacoima CA 91331 USA: Quick Reference Profile
Pacoima's 91331 ZIP code has an estimated 99,804 residents, median household income near $76,942, and a homeownership rate close to 63%, making it a dense, predominantly owner-occupied urban market rather than a low-density suburban fringe. Those three figures are useful anchors, but they don't answer the relocation question by themselves. Pacoima is better evaluated as a transitional San Fernando Valley corridor where parcel-level hazards, environmental conditions, redevelopment, and traffic can change the experience from one micro-area to another.
Table of Contents
- What 91331 Is and Where It Sits
- A Brief Civic Timeline for Pacoima
- Population Density and Age Structure
- Housing Income and Tenure Snapshot
- Crime Snapshot at ZIP Level
- Flood Fire Heat and Seismic Risk Layers
- Redevelopment Pressure Along Glenoaks
- Using ReloMaps to Benchmark 91331
- Frequently Asked Questions
What 91331 Is and Where It Sits
The most practical starting point for Pacoima CA 91331 USA is to separate the ZIP boundary from the neighborhood label. The area contains roughly 99,804 residents, median household income around $76,942, and homeownership near 63%, according to 91331 ZIP profile data. Together, those figures describe a substantial, family-oriented market with a meaningful owner base and enough density to support established commercial and civic infrastructure.
The ZIP covers about 9.3 square miles, placing it in the northeastern San Fernando Valley inside the City of Los Angeles. Its geography is shaped by the 210 and 5 freeways, the Verdugo Mountains foothills, Hansen Dam Recreation Area, and the Pacoima Wash. The ZIP isn't an independent municipality. It falls within the Los Angeles City Council Northeast Valley region, so city services, planning decisions, and infrastructure funding operate through Los Angeles rather than a separate Pacoima government.
How to avoid a ZIP boundary mistake
Search results often blend Pacoima with nearby areas. 91340 generally points toward San Fernando, 91342 includes Sylmar, 91345 covers Mission Hills and nearby communities, and 91402 reaches Panorama City and adjacent parts of the Valley. Those codes aren't interchangeable for housing, commuting, hazard, or demographic analysis.
For a citywide baseline, compare the ZIP with Los Angeles, California neighborhood data, then verify the exact address. ZIP-level figures can conceal sharp differences near freeways, industrial parcels, open channels, and foothill edges.
A Brief Civic Timeline for Pacoima
Pacoima's civic identity began long before modern Los Angeles. Indigenous settlement in the area extends back more than 1,500 years, with the community often associated with Pacoinga Village in the Pacoima Wash watershed. The historical record describes an area connected to Indigenous life, water movement, and local travel routes before Spanish colonization reshaped land ownership and administration.
A major modern transition came in 1887, when Jouette Allen purchased 1,000 acres from the Maclay interests and named the area Pacoima, a term commonly translated as “the entrance.” The arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor gave the settlement a stronger connection to regional movement, agriculture, and employment. That transportation link helped establish the physical pattern that still matters today, a community shaped by corridors rather than by a single isolated town center. These historical details come from the Pacoima Historical Society timeline.
Annexation and postwar change
In 1915, Pacoima became part of the City of Los Angeles. The decision connected the community to expanding municipal infrastructure and reinforced its relationship with the railroad and industrial corridors. After World War II, Black families moved into Pacoima in significant numbers, followed by immigrant families from rural Mexico during the late 1960s as housing costs and industrial employment influenced settlement.
The community's later history includes the 1971 Sylmar earthquake, the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and a 1994 vote rejecting incorporation. Those events matter because they shaped perceptions of municipal identity, housing resilience, and the relationship between Pacoima and the wider city. Post-2000 immigration further strengthened Mexican, Salvadoran, and Guatemalan roots, making Pacoima a historically layered community rather than a place defined by one founding era.
Population Density and Age Structure
A ZIP with nearly one hundred thousand residents across 9.3 square miles should be compared with inner-ring Los Angeles neighborhoods, not with low-density communities in Ventura County. The historical profile for 91331 recorded 103,689 residents in the 2010 U.S. census, while later profile data lists 97,608 residents across the same approximate land area, implying density of about 10,445 people per square mile according to the Pacoima demographic and historical record.
The figures don't perfectly align because they come from different periods and profile methodologies. That discrepancy is itself useful. It shows why relocation decisions shouldn't treat a ZIP summary as a live parcel-level description.
| Indicator | 91331 estimate | City of LA reference |
|---|---|---|
| Population | Near 99,804 | Use citywide data only as a broad benchmark |
| Land area | About 9.3 square miles | Citywide geography is substantially broader |
| Implied density | About 10,445 people per square mile in the historical profile | Inner-ring urban context is the appropriate comparison |
| Historical median age | 29.5 in the 2010-era profile | Citywide comparison requires the same reference year |
| Household structure | Family-oriented profile | Household composition varies significantly by ZIP |
| Homeownership | Near 63% | Owner and renter balance varies across Los Angeles |
What the age profile suggests
The historical profile reported a median age of 29.5 and a median household income of $49,842 for the same 2010-era period. Those figures shouldn't be substituted for the later ZIP estimate, but they help establish the community's long-running character as relatively young and family-oriented.
A dense family market creates different relocation pressures from a renter-heavy urban district. School demand, parking, multigenerational housing, and household space can matter more than a simple population count. For a buyer, the practical question isn't whether Pacoima is “urban” or “suburban.” It's whether a specific property sits in a stable residential pocket, beside a high-volume corridor, or near land uses that may change.
Housing Income and Tenure Snapshot
The housing picture is easy to misread because the available figures span different periods. A later ZIP profile places median household income near $76,942, while a historical baseline places it near $45,912. The gap doesn't prove a specific income trend. It reflects the need to distinguish a 2010-era measure from a later estimate before using either figure in an underwriting or affordability decision.
| Indicator | 91331 (91331) | Los Angeles city | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median household income | Around $76,942 | Comparable year and methodology required | Comparable year and methodology required |
| Historical income baseline | Near $45,912 | Historical city comparison required | Historical state comparison required |
| Median home value | Use current parcel and market records | Citywide average can hide neighborhood variation | Statewide average is too broad for a ZIP decision |
| Median gross rent | Use current lease evidence | Citywide rent masks corridor differences | Statewide rent masks local conditions |
| Homeownership | Near 63% | Varies by neighborhood | Varies by county and city |
| Renter cost burden | Qualitative review required | Tenure and burden differ by submarket | Statewide comparison needs matching definitions |
The supplied profile also references a median home value near $572,000, median gross rent close to $1,780, and a cost-burdened renter share above 55% in the comparison framework. Those figures should be treated as period-specific indicators, not as a guaranteed current asking price or rent. A listing, lease, tax record, or appraisal may produce a different result because 91331 crosses multiple census tracts and property types.
The underwriting implication
The ownership rate near 63% suggests that tenure is a central part of Pacoima's market identity. Owner occupancy can support longer residential holding periods, but it doesn't eliminate affordability stress. A household can own a home while facing high insurance, maintenance, transportation, utility, or property-tax costs.
Small-area margins of error also matter. If you're comparing Pacoima with Arleta, Mission Hills, Panorama City, or San Fernando, use matched data years and definitions. Don't place a historical income median beside a current home value and call the combination a current affordability ratio.
Crime Snapshot at ZIP Level
ZIP-level crime data is not precise enough to answer whether every part of 91331 is safe. It aggregates reports across different reporting areas and may include both city and unincorporated coverage, while census ZIP boundaries don't line up cleanly with police beats, block groups, or individual corridors.
| Offense category | 91331 rate per 1,000 | Los Angeles City rate per 1,000 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Violent crime | Not verified in the supplied data | Not verified in the supplied data | Avoid using an uncited ZIP estimate as a block-level conclusion |
| Property crime | Not verified in the supplied data | Not verified in the supplied data | Check address-specific reporting areas |
| Burglary | Not verified in the supplied data | Not verified in the supplied data | Residential and commercial edges can differ |
| Motor vehicle theft | Not verified in the supplied data | Not verified in the supplied data | Freeway and arterial access can affect exposure |
| Arson | Not verified as a ZIP rate | Not verified as a city rate | LAFD's reported profile is a useful supplemental proxy |
The supplied planning framework references an LAFD arson profile near 12 incidents annually, but that figure isn't a complete 91331 crime rate and shouldn't be presented as one. It may help identify a category for follow-up, not settle the relocation decision.
A better verification sequence
Start with the address, then identify the relevant LAPD COMPSTAT division and reporting geography. Next, compare recent incidents by offense type and location rather than relying on a blended ZIP rate. Finally, review environmental justice layers, including Cal Enviro Screen crime-related indicators, because safety and environmental exposure can overlap without measuring the same thing.
A property beside the I-5 corridor, Hansen Dam Recreation Area, an industrial edge, or a busy commercial arterial may have a different practical risk profile from a home several blocks inside a residential grid. ZIP statistics can't isolate those conditions.
Flood Fire Heat and Seismic Risk Layers
Pacoima shouldn't be treated as a single-hazard market. A CSU Northridge thesis classifies the area within a combined flood, fire, and liquefaction risk context, while FEMA-based profile data places 91331 in Flood Zone X. Zone X is outside the mapped 100-year floodplain but can still face exposure during the 500-year event, localized drainage problems, channel overflow, or intense surface runoff. The FEMA flood-zone context for Pacoima is therefore a screening tool, not a substitute for parcel diligence.
| Hazard layer | 91331 exposure | Severity rank | Primary source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flood | Generally low mapped flood exposure, with localized drainage and channel questions | Low at ZIP summary level, variable by parcel | FEMA Zone X profile |
| Wildfire | Foothill and brush-edge conditions require address review | Not verified in supplied data | State hazard mapping should be checked parcel by parcel |
| Seismic and liquefaction | Combined earthquake and ground-instability considerations | Not verified in supplied data | CSU Northridge hazard research |
| Urban heat | Extensive hardscape increases heat exposure | Not assigned a numeric rank in supplied data | UCLA Luskin Pacoima heat study |
| Air quality | Localized concern near major transportation and industrial corridors | Not assigned a numeric rank in supplied data | Pacoima Beautiful sensor program |
The heat layer deserves special attention. UCLA describes extensive hardscape, including roads, buildings, walkways, and parking lots, which can increase heat exposure. In 2025, Pacoima Beautiful deployed 6 air-quality sensors, and a 2026 community update highlighted the Pacoima Wash Greenway as a heat-resilience project during an intense heat wave, according to the supplied environmental-risk record.
Practical rule: Treat the ZIP as a screening boundary. Treat the parcel, drainage path, building envelope, shade conditions, and nearby traffic corridor as the decision boundary.
Use California hazard data for relocation comparisons to organize the layers, then verify flood insurance requirements, drainage history, seismic disclosures, air-quality conditions, and heat exposure for the exact property.
Redevelopment Pressure Along Glenoaks
Glenoaks Boulevard is more than a commercial street. It acts as a decision corridor where housing, retail, freight movement, civic investment, and neighborhood identity meet. A proposed mixed-use project at 11623 N. Glenoaks Boulevard and a planning item involving a roughly 67,000-square-foot warehouse project indicate continued land-use change, according to Los Angeles County planning documentation.
That doesn't establish that redevelopment will improve or weaken every nearby property. It establishes uncertainty. A buyer near the corridor may gain access to new services, jobs, public improvements, or more active streets. The same buyer may also face construction disruption, freight traffic, delivery noise, parking pressure, or a future land use that changes the residential feel.
The corridor has several competing forces
The Pacoima Arts and Culture Center supports an arts-led civic identity near City Hall. Murals and bike infrastructure reinforce that identity, while warehouse and logistics activity around the I-5 interchange can direct regional trucking onto local arterials. Along Van Nuys Boulevard, affordable-housing pipelines and adaptive reuse of former auto-body sites may add residential intensity.
These are not separate stories. They form a land-use system:
- Residential change: Single-family areas may absorb small-lot subdivisions and additional units.
- Commercial pressure: Glenoaks must serve residents while accommodating regional movement.
- Employment access: Industrial uses can create nearby jobs but also increase heavy-vehicle activity.
- Resale uncertainty: Cultural improvements don't automatically translate into a premium for every block.
The most important question isn't whether Pacoima is changing. It's which projects actually break ground, and what traffic and land-use pattern they create around the property you're evaluating.
A relocation client should review project approvals, construction timelines, truck routes, parking requirements, and the distance between the parcel and the proposed site. That process gives more useful information than treating 91331 as a finished neighborhood with a fixed identity.
Using ReloMaps to Benchmark 91331
ReloMaps can serve as a cross-check layer after the ZIP-level review, not as a replacement for inspections, public records, or professional underwriting. Enter Pacoima's 91331 ZIP code to compare affordability, hazards, demographics, ownership, and strategic location factors in one framework through the ReloMaps location intelligence platform.
Use a repeatable sequence:
- Start with the property. Paste a Zillow or Redfin listing URL, or identify the address, so the analysis begins with the parcel rather than the ZIP label.
- Screen hazards. Review flood, fire, seismic, and broader disaster-risk overlays. A Zone X result should prompt localized drainage questions, not end the investigation.
- Test the corridor. Compare commute isochrones with Glenoaks Boulevard, the I-5 interchange, and the relevant employment destinations. A nominal distance advantage can disappear during peak congestion.
- Build the comparison set. Benchmark 91331 against 91340 San Fernando, 91342 Sylmar, 91345 Mission Hills, and 91402 Panorama City, while keeping data years and property types consistent.
- Verify before bidding. Use the headline income and tenure figures as context, then confirm insurance, taxes, disclosures, permits, noise, and infrastructure conditions for the specific parcel.
This workflow matters because households rarely choose a ZIP in isolation. They choose a property with a commute, hazard profile, carrying cost, school-demand environment, and resale outlook. A city profile can narrow the search, while a property report can expose differences hidden by the ZIP boundary.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Pacoima 91331 safe for relocation?
Pacoima 91331 requires address-level crime verification because ZIP aggregates conceal block-by-block variation near industrial edges, major roads, and recreation areas. The supplied data doesn't verify a current violent-crime or property-crime rate for 91331, so a responsible answer can't assign a numeric safety threshold from the ZIP alone.
Check the relevant LAPD Foothill Division records and COMPSTAT geography for the specific address. Then inspect the immediate walking route, lighting, parking exposure, commercial adjacency, and evening activity. A home can sit within the same ZIP as a materially different local environment.
Does every Pacoima 91331 property need flood insurance?
No, Flood Zone X generally means a property is outside the mapped 100-year floodplain and typically doesn't face mandatory federal flood-insurance requirements, although lenders and local conditions can differ. Parcels inside a designated 100-year floodplain along the Pacoima Wash can face mandatory insurance requirements, so the FEMA panel and lender determination must be checked for the exact parcel.
Ask for prior claims, drainage disclosures, grading information, and evidence of water entry. Surface runoff and channel overflow can affect a property even when the ZIP's broad classification appears low risk.
Is 91331 in a very high wildfire hazard zone?
The supplied data doesn't verify that all of 91331 sits inside a State Responsibility Area Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and ZIP-level labeling shouldn't settle the question. Brush near foothill or corridor edges can still create ember exposure, so review defensible-space conditions and the structure's roof, vents, windows, and access route.
The relevant threshold is the parcel's mapped zone and insurance underwriting result. A buyer should request the current state and local hazard maps rather than infer wildfire exposure from the Pacoima name alone.
How serious is earthquake risk in Pacoima?
Earthquake risk is material because the area is discussed in relation to seismic shaking and liquefaction, but the supplied data doesn't establish a parcel-specific Alquist-Priolo designation or fault distance. Review the title report, geological disclosures, foundation condition, retrofit history, and local soil information before treating a home as structurally comparable with another 91331 property.
The 1971 Sylmar and 1994 Northridge earthquakes are useful historical reminders, but they don't predict damage at an individual address. Building age, construction type, foundation, slope, and site conditions control the practical exposure.
Is a Pacoima home near $660,000 affordable?
A home near $660,000 should be evaluated against household income, down payment, interest rate, insurance, taxes, maintenance, and transportation costs rather than a ZIP median alone. The supplied FAQ framework identifies that value as a comparison threshold, while the verified ZIP profile places median household income around $76,942.
Buyers should calculate a property-specific monthly carrying cost and preserve room for hazard-related insurance changes. A household that qualifies for the purchase can still experience stress if the property requires major seismic work, flood coverage, cooling upgrades, or frequent vehicle travel.
What overrides a ZIP-level relocation conclusion?
The APN and property records override a ZIP-level conclusion for any binding purchase decision. Confirm the parcel's flood panel, hazard designations, permits, insurance terms, code compliance, redevelopment adjacency, and actual commute route before signing.
ZIP data is valuable for screening. It isn't a substitute for a title review, inspection, lender decision, environmental assessment, or direct visit at the times of day that matter to your household.
Use ReloMaps to compare Pacoima 91331 with nearby San Fernando Valley alternatives while screening the specific property's hazard and commute context. Visit ReloMaps to build a parcel-aware shortlist before you make an offer or commit to a relocation.
Enjoying the blog? Subscribe to ReloMaps+ for premium area intelligence — and to keep us independent.
Subscribe today