best states for low taxes

Best States for Low Taxes: 10 Tradeoffs to Weigh

Sep 30, 202614 min read
Best States for Low Taxes: 10 Tradeoffs to Weigh

Texas, Florida, South Dakota, Nevada, New Hampshire, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Tennessee, and Mississippi are the strongest candidates for low taxes, but the best pick depends on whether your household needs relief from income tax, property tax, or sales tax. The lowest tax bill isn't always the cheapest move, because no income tax can still coexist with higher property costs, steep sales taxes, or expensive insurance and utilities.

The smartest way to compare the best states for low taxes is to separate income, property, and sales taxes, then add the local picture. A state can look friendly on paper and still punish owners through housing, commuting, or disaster exposure, which is why city-level screening matters as much as the state label. Tools like ReloMaps help compare city and neighborhood context before you commit, especially when you want to weigh tax burden against safety, affordability, commute, and personal-sovereignty preferences. For broader tax context, the rules around deductions also matter, which is why this state tax deduction limits explained resource is worth a look.

Table of Contents

1. Texas No State Income Tax Plus Low Property Tax in Select Areas

Texas stays near the top of every low-tax conversation because it has no state income tax and a tax environment that can still work for high earners, founders, and remote workers. Tax Foundation's 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index places Texas at #7 overall among all 50 states, which matters because it scores the full tax structure instead of only one levy (Tax Foundation 2026 index).

Austin, Texas shows why the ranking needs context. A tech worker can like the zero-income-tax setup and still get squeezed by housing pressure, transit costs, and local tax variation, while a rural household may get much more room to breathe. For a practical entry point, compare Austin, Texas on ReloMaps with cheaper cities before assuming the capital city is the best tax play.

Practical rule: In Texas, the tax win is strongest when your income is high and your housing choice is disciplined. If you're buying in a premium metro, the property side can eat into what looked like a clean savings story.

A better Texas screen is to ask where the household will live and spend. Austin-area suburbs, Dallas job corridors, and smaller Hill Country towns can land in very different tax and cost profiles even though they sit under the same state banner. If your spending is heavy on vehicles, home upgrades, and taxable retail, the sales-tax side deserves as much attention as the income-tax side.

2. Florida Zero Income Tax Plus Retiree-Friendly Structure

Florida remains one of the clearest low-tax options for households that want to avoid a state income tax while keeping a broad market of retiree-friendly communities. The Tax Foundation's 2025 State Tax Competitiveness Index places Florida in the top five, and the same index shows why it's often used as a low-tax benchmark in relocation research (Tax Foundation facts and figures PDF). It also ranked #5 overall in the 2026 index, which reinforces that its tax structure is competitive across multiple categories, not just one (Tax Foundation 2026 index).

That doesn't mean every Florida household wins equally. A retiree in Tampa, Florida may get a strong mix of no state income tax and established healthcare access, while a coastal buyer may face a much rougher insurance equation than the tax label suggests. For a more local comparison, start with Tampa, Florida on ReloMaps, then compare neighborhood-level tradeoffs instead of treating the whole state as one market.

Florida fits best for households whose taxable income is meaningful and whose housing plan is manageable. It's also a good reminder that tax structure and insurance structure are not the same thing. A low-tax state can still be expensive if the home sits in a flood-prone, storm-sensitive area.

3. South Dakota No Income Tax and a Broad Tax-Competitive Profile

South Dakota is one of the most convincing low-tax states because it combines no state income tax with a tax structure that remains competitive for both residents and businesses. In the 2026 Tax Foundation ranking, it sits at #2 overall, just behind Wyoming, which tells you its appeal isn't a single-issue fluke (Tax Foundation 2026 index). The 2025 index also showed South Dakota ranking highly across multiple tax categories, which is why it keeps appearing as a benchmark in relocation research (Tax Foundation facts and figures PDF).

Sioux Falls, South Dakota is the obvious city-level filter here because it gives you the most economic depth in the state. That matters if you want a low-tax state without giving up too much job access or service infrastructure. For people who work remotely or run a small business, the question is less “Is South Dakota low tax?” and more “Does my household fit the geography and climate?”

A useful way to screen South Dakota is to think about winter, broadband, and driving distance before you think about tax slogans. If your work can handle a smaller metro and your household values tax simplicity, the state deserves attention. If you need dense urban amenities, it may feel too narrow even if the tax math looks excellent.

4. Nevada No Income Tax With a High-Spend Lifestyle Tradeoff

Nevada is a clean answer for income-tax avoidance, but it only stays attractive if your spending habits and location choices are disciplined. It has no state income tax, and that makes it appealing for traders, retirees, and business owners who want to keep more of what they earn. Tax Foundation places Nevada outside the top five overall in the 2026 index, which is a useful reminder that no-income-tax status doesn't automatically make it the best low-tax state (Tax Foundation 2026 index).

Las Vegas, Nevada and Reno each tell a different story. Las Vegas gives you the most visible entertainment economy, while Reno is often chosen by remote workers and people leaving California-style housing markets. The catch is that desirable neighborhoods can get expensive fast, so the savings from no income tax may shrink if your housing budget climbs.

Decision rule: Nevada works best when your household can tolerate higher electric bills, a more volatile entertainment-driven economy, and a neighborhood screen that gets very specific. The state label alone won't tell you whether the move is actually cheaper.

That's why city-level research matters more than the state headline. A suburban family in Henderson, Nevada may care more about school fit and housing value than income-tax savings, while a high earner in Las Vegas may see the tax savings clearly but still need to budget for a different cost pattern than they're used to.

5. New Hampshire Low Income Tax on Investments and No Sales Tax

New Hampshire is one of the most misunderstood low-tax states because it doesn't tax wages the way many assume when they hear “income tax state.” The state has no sales tax and no tax on earned wages, but it does tax certain investment income, and its property taxes are relatively high. That mix makes it a strong fit for some retirees and investors, but not a blanket win for homeowners.

The biggest mistake is to compare New Hampshire only with states that tax wages heavily. That ignores the way property taxes can offset the benefit for a house-rich household. A couple with substantial dividend or interest income may find the state attractive, especially if they shop across the border for high-ticket items, but a homeowner with modest investment income could see a much smaller benefit.

Portsmouth, New Hampshire is a good screening example because it shows the tradeoff between walkability, school access, and cost structure. The state's appeal is strongest for households that value New England access, no sales tax, and a narrower tax footprint on earned wages, not for every buyer chasing a headline about low taxes.

6. Wyoming The Strongest Low-Tax State for Broad Household Flexibility

Wyoming stands at the top of the 2026 Tax Foundation index at #1 overall, and it also ranked among the top five in the 2025 index, which makes it the clearest all-around low-tax benchmark in the country (Tax Foundation 2026 index, Tax Foundation facts and figures PDF). The reason it keeps winning these rankings is simple, it avoids several of the major tax categories that weigh on households elsewhere.

Cheyenne, Wyoming is the best place to evaluate that claim because it gives you a more practical read than a romantic homestead story. A remote worker, a business owner, and a land buyer can all get very different outcomes from the same statewide tax policy. For homesteading and personal-sovereignty buyers, Wyoming also stands out because the tax benefit aligns with property-rights and land-use priorities.

Practical rule: Wyoming is strongest when you want tax simplicity plus room to spread out. If you need specialist care, frequent flights, or dense amenities, the tax win can get diluted fast.

The state's real advantage is not just zero income tax. It's that the whole package can work for people who want a low-interference, low-burden environment and are willing to accept fewer urban conveniences. That's why it often outranks flashier states that only solve part of the tax problem.

7. Alaska Zero Income Tax With a High Cost of Living Offset

Alaska is one of the purest low-income-tax states, but it can be one of the most expensive places to live once you account for isolation and logistics. The 2025 Tax Foundation materials show Alaska at the top of individual income-tax competitiveness, and the state's tax burden analysis found Alaska had the lowest combined state-and-local tax burden in 2022 at 4.6% of state income (Tax Foundation facts and figures PDF, Calcfi tax burden map). That's a powerful number, but it's not the whole story.

Anchorage, Alaska gives the clearest city-level test because it adds the most services and access while still carrying Alaska's structural tradeoffs. Rural Alaska takes the tradeoffs further, with higher transport costs and much less convenience. The state works best for people whose lifestyle values isolation, self-reliance, and low direct tax exposure more than easy access to services.

Alaska is not a generic “cheapest” choice. It's a place where tax relief can be real while day-to-day living costs stay stubbornly high. That distinction matters for retirees, remote workers, and anyone considering a long-term move rather than a short visit.

8. Montana Low Tax Pressure for Business Owners and Outdoor-Oriented Households

Montana belongs in a low-tax shortlist because it combines no sales tax with a tax structure that can work well for business owners and households that want a quieter Mountain West lifestyle. Tax Foundation's 2025 ranking put Montana in the top five, and the 2026 index still keeps it near the top at #6 overall (Tax Foundation facts and figures PDF, Tax Foundation 2026 index). That gives it a strong place in any serious comparison of the best states for low taxes.

Missoula, Montana and Bozeman, Montana are the best examples of why the state is more complicated than the tax slogan. Both offer livability, recreation, and established communities, but housing pressure can erase part of the tax advantage if you buy in a hot neighborhood. That's why Montana often appeals to people who want tax relief and outdoor access more than a bargain-hunting zip code.

The state is strongest for owners who care about business structure, primary-residence treatment, and a lifestyle that doesn't depend on dense metro amenities. If you're comparing mountain states, Montana can look better than Colorado on a tax basis while still feeling more manageable than some deeper-rural options.

9. Tennessee Zero Income Tax and a Stronger Urban Fit Than Most Low-Tax States

Tennessee is one of the few no-income-tax states that also gives you real urban options, which makes it much more usable for households that want both tax relief and city life. The 2026 Tax Foundation index puts Tennessee at #8 overall, a strong result for a state that also has a broad mix of jobs, healthcare, and cultural destinations (Tax Foundation 2026 index). That's especially useful for people who don't want to choose between tax savings and a workable metro.

Nashville, Tennessee is the best-known example, but Memphis, Tennessee and Knoxville, Tennessee matter too because they offer different lifestyle combinations. The tax advantage is strongest for wage earners and remote workers who also need an actual urban market, not just a low-tax ZIP code.

Tennessee also shows why sales tax can't be ignored. A state can be income-tax friendly and still hit households through everyday spending, which matters more if you buy a lot of taxable goods or plan to live in a car-dependent metro. If your household spends heavily on consumption, Tennessee's fit depends on whether the city side is worth the tradeoff.

10. Mississippi Lowest Cost of Living Meets a Moderate Tax Load

Mississippi is the most budget-sensitive state on this list, and that's why it belongs in a low-tax discussion even though it does not have zero income tax. The Tax Foundation's 2026 ranking doesn't put it among the very top tax competitors, but Mississippi can still make sense for households that care more about total monthly pressure than about a pure tax slogan (Tax Foundation 2026 index). The reason is simple, a modest tax structure paired with lower housing pressure can create a more manageable real-world bill than a low-tax state with costly housing.

Jackson, Mississippi is the clearest example because it gives you an urban service base without coastal pricing. That makes the state attractive for retirees on fixed incomes and remote workers who want maximum purchasing power. It's also a useful reminder that a “low-tax” state isn't always the same thing as a “zero-tax” state, and the difference matters.

Mississippi fits households that are optimizing for affordability over prestige, not the other way around. If your main goal is to lower the total cost of ownership, not just your state tax line, it deserves a serious look.

Top 10 Low-Tax States Comparison

State Tax profile (income / sales / property) Resource requirements (housing, insurance, utilities, services) Expected outcomes (net tax impact / tradeoffs) Ideal use cases Key advantages
Texas No state income tax; sales tax ~8.25% avg; property tax ~0.80% avg (varies by county) Metro home prices rising (Austin $550K+); variable property rates; flood/hurricane insurance on coast Low overall tax for high earners; six-figure earners save $10k+ annually but metro property tax and housing can offset gains High earners, businesses, remote workers, retirees Zero income tax; business-friendly; strong job markets (tech, energy, healthcare)
Florida No state income tax; sales tax 6% base (~7.5% avg); property tax ~0.83% avg; homestead exemption Hurricane insurance $1.5k–3k+ coastal; rising property values (Miami/Tampa); strong healthcare in metros Very favorable for retirees/high-net-worth; $8k–12k potential income-tax savings but insurance and housing may offset Retirees, high-net-worth individuals, snowbirds No income tax on retirement; homestead exemption; retiree-focused incentives
South Dakota No individual or corporate income tax; sales tax 4.5% base (~5.5% avg); property tax ~0.84% avg Low cost of living; rural broadband and amenity gaps; higher winter heating costs Very low tax burden; sizable savings for relocating businesses/individuals; fewer urban amenities Business owners, financial services, remote workers No income/corporate tax; low living costs; favorable trust and business laws
Nevada No state income tax; sales tax ~8.375% avg; property tax ~0.6% avg High summer AC costs ($2.5k–4k); volatile housing tied to gaming markets; tourism-driven services Large tax savings for investors/high earners; regressive sales tax impacts middle/lower incomes; housing volatility Traders, entertainment businesses, retirees, high earners No tax on investment income; strong tourism/gaming economy; low property tax
New Hampshire 5% tax on dividends/interest only; no sales tax; property tax ~1.17% avg High property taxes; cold winters (heating $2k–3.5k); proximity to Boston amenities Good for investors with passive income and big-ticket shoppers; limited benefit for wage earners due to high property tax High-net-worth investors, shoppers seeking tax-free purchases No sales tax; low tax on investment income; attractive for vehicle/large purchases
Wyoming No income, corporate, or capital gains tax; sales tax 4% base (~5.36% avg); property tax ~0.61% avg Affordable land; sparse services and healthcare; winter heating costs; broadband varies Extremely low effective tax; large savings for business owners/investors; limited urban amenities Homesteaders, business owners, investors, remote workers Minimal taxes across the board; strong property rights; low property tax
Alaska No state income tax; no state sales tax (local options exist); property tax ~0.84% avg; PFD ~$1k–2k Very high cost of living (food, transport); large heating and fuel bills; limited healthcare in rural areas Low taxes plus dividend partially offset very high living costs; remote-lifestyle tradeoffs significant Resource workers, homesteaders, those seeking remote/isolated lifestyles No income/sales tax statewide; Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend; abundant land/resources
Montana No corporate income tax; personal income tax 2–10.75%; no sales tax; property tax ~0.84% avg (primary residence exemptions) Housing rising in popular areas (Bozeman, Missoula); winter heating costs; good outdoor recreation infrastructure Beneficial for businesses (no corporate tax); moderate personal tax burden; no sales tax aids purchases Business owners, outdoor recreation seekers, remote workers No corporate tax; no sales tax; strong outdoor amenities and quality communities
Tennessee No wage income tax; sales tax ~9.45% avg (high); property tax ~0.85% avg; dividend tax phased out High sales tax burden; rising Nashville housing (median $500K+); summer AC costs Good for wage earners relocating from high-tax states; high consumption tax reduces net gains for middle incomes Wage earners, urban job seekers (Nashville), businesses relocating Zero wage income tax; growing urban economy and healthcare hub
Mississippi Income tax 2–5% graduated; sales tax ~7% avg; property tax ~0.79% avg; median home $150K–250K Very low housing costs; variable healthcare and education quality; hot, humid summers (AC costs) Very low overall cost of living yields strong purchasing power; modest tax savings but limited amenities Retirees on fixed incomes, budget-conscious buyers, remote workers Lowest cost of living; very affordable housing; low property tax

Choose the Tax Mix That Fits Your Household

The right low-tax state depends on where your money comes from and where it goes next. Start with the largest income source, then estimate annual property tax, taxable spending, insurance, utilities, healthcare, and commuting. A household that earns mostly wages will read the map differently from a landlord, a retiree, or a business owner, and that's why one state never fits every profile.

The fastest way to avoid a bad move is to stop judging states by the income-tax line alone. Property taxes can punish homeowners, sales taxes can punish spenders, and insurance can punish coastal buyers. The Tax Foundation's rankings are useful because they compare the whole structure, not just a single rate, but the final decision still belongs at the city and neighborhood level (Tax Foundation 2026 index).

That's where local screening becomes essential. Compare Austin, Texas on ReloMaps if you're considering a major Texas move, then check city pages for affordability, safety, commute, population, disaster exposure, and personal-sovereignty indicators before you lock in a ZIP code. ReloMaps is built for that kind of comparison, which is exactly why state labels alone aren't enough for relocation planning.

If you want a simple decision rule, use this one. Choose Texas, Florida, or Tennessee if income-tax relief matters most and you want a stronger urban or suburban market. Choose Wyoming, South Dakota, Montana, or Alaska if you care more about broad tax structure, land, or sovereignty. Choose New Hampshire if your income is tied to investments and you can live with higher property taxes. Choose Mississippi if your goal is the lowest total cost, not the flashiest tax headline. Then verify the city fit before you move, because the tax win only matters if the rest of the household math works too.

ReloMaps gives you the city and neighborhood context that state rankings leave out, including tax burden, safety, commute, housing, disaster exposure, and personal-sovereignty indicators. If you're narrowing down the best states for low taxes, use that local lens to see whether the numbers still work where you would live. Visit ReloMaps and compare the places you're considering before you commit.

Enjoying the blog? Subscribe to ReloMaps+ for premium area intelligence — and to keep us independent.

Subscribe today